Sunday, June 24, 2012

Hitler's Side of the Story

This post is not meant in any way to justify Hitler's actions, to belittle the damage done by Hitler and the Nazi Party, or to encourage holocaust deniers or anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists. It is only meant to present what I feel to be Hitler's side of the story: his motivations, how he came to hate the Jews, his convictions, and the series of events that led to Hitler's decision to systematically exterminate, rather than merely oppress and relocate the Jews. If you wish to learn more about Hitler's foundational motivations that led to his rise to power and anti-Semitic beliefs and actions, I recommend you read his magnum opus "Mein Kampf" (lit. "My Struggle").

I think Hitler was an opportunist, and that was his primary political incentive. he wanted power and to change the world, and saw the means to do so. He didn't actually want to kill the Jews at first, and his original plan was to banish them and get rid of their ability to conduct business. basically, prevent them from causing any further damage.

It wasn't until after WWII became an inevitability that Hitler started really wanting to kill the jews. before that, he actually passed legislation to improve living conditions for the Jews. It's far more complicated of a story than anyone knows.

Hitler strongly felt that the Germans had both the ability and resources to win the first World War, and the Germans somehow lost anyway, he felt that the German people were being betrayed, and that most of them were 'taking it up the ass' (metaphorically speaking), even though they were betrayed by their own politicians. He was certain the German defeat was the result of the manipulation of the German military by a third-party, and he made it a mission to find out what this third-party was.

After Hitler read some anti-semitic literature, he first discounted it as tabloid material, but the idea of a Jewish conspiracy remained in his mind. he did a great deal of research, and came to the conclusion that the Jewish people were the ones who brought about the betrayal of the Germans that caused them to lose WWI, and that furthermore, the Jews were manipulating the whole world, with the aim of taking it over completely. The more he researched and thought about it, the more convinced Hitler became that the Jews were the biggest threat the the world. He then made it his mission to gain power in Germany by any means necessary, to save the German nation from the scourge that were the Jews.

While Hitler was in prison (before the Nazi party or any of the travesties he is blamed for took place) "He announced that he wanted to completely destroy the parliamentary system, believing it in principle to be corrupt, as those who reach power are inherent opportunists"

this means that Hitler knew that by reaching power he would become an opportunist, and even while in prison he was planning to corrupt himself for the self-righteous cause of freeing the German people from the two greatest evils the world had ever seen: Communism and Judaism.

Hitler initially just wanted to relocate the Jews, to conquer regions that had a Jewish population, and then move the German-Jews over there. But his conquests got the attention of Britain and France, and soon the whole world was spreading FUD about the German National Socialist takeover, and WWII had begun.

When Hitler realized that WWII was coming, he once again blamed the Jews, because in the course of his research he discovered that the Jews controlled the vast majority of the media. He was certain that the Jews had used their power to incite the European nations against Germany, that the Jewish had manipulated the whole of Europe into declaring war against the German nation. Thus, he said: "If international finance Jewry in and outside Europe should succeed in thrusting the nations once again into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevisation of the earth and with it the victory of Jewry, but the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe."

Hitler had become convinced that the Jews were the cause of WWII, that they had used to media to create war for profit, and that they were once again using their media to mislead the people's of Europe, and to incite another world war against Germany. So he had decided that if the Jews once again brought about another world war, he would do everything he can to exterminate them, so as to put an end to their destructive and manipulative influence. It was with this quote that he had finally changed his mind about what to do about the Jews. At first he just wanted to strip them of their money and power, and remove their presence from Germany. But now, realizing that the Jews were too powerful to be neutralized peacefully, he vowed to destroy them completely, for the betterment of both the German nation and mankind.

Hitler and his Nazi party were devout Protestant Christians, and felt that their actions aligned with the will of God and the German people. This is clearly expressed in Himmler's Poznan speech:

"I also want to mention a very difficult subject before you here, completely openly.

It should be discussed amongst us, and yet, nevertheless, we will never speak about it in public.

Just as we did not hesitate on June 30 to carry out our duty, as ordered, and stand comrades who had failed against the wall and shoot them.

About which we have never spoken, and never will speak.

That was, thank God, a kind of tact natural to us, a foregone conclusion of that tact, that we have never conversed about it amongst ourselves, never spoken about it, everyone shuddered, and everyone was clear that the next time, he would do the same thing again, if it were commanded and necessary.

I am talking about the "Jewish evacuation": the extermination of the Jewish people.

It is one of those things that is easily said. "The Jewish people is being exterminated," every Party member will tell you, "perfectly clear, it's part of our plans, we're eliminating the Jews, exterminating them, ha!, a small matter."

And then along they all come, all the 80 million upright Germans, and each one has his decent Jew. They say: all the others are swine, but here is a first-class Jew.

And none of them has seen it, has endured it. Most of you will know what it means when 100 bodies lie together, when there are 500, or when there are 1000. And to have seen this through, and -- with the exception of human weaknesses -- to have remained decent, has made us hard and is a page of glory never mentioned and never to be mentioned.

Because we know how difficult things would be, if today in every city during the bomb attacks, the burdens of war and the privations, we still had Jews as secret saboteurs, agitators and instigators. We would probably be at the same stage as 1916-17, if the Jews still resided in the body of the German people.

We have taken away the riches that they had, and I have given a strict order, which Obergruppenführer Pohl has carried out, we have delivered these riches completely to the Reich, to the State. We have taken nothing from them for ourselves. A few, who have offended against this, will be [judged] in accordance with an order, that I gave at the beginning: He who takes even one Mark of this is a dead man.

A number of SS men have offended against this order. There are not very many, and they will be dead men - WITHOUT MERCY! We have the moral right, we had the duty to our people to do it, to kill this people who wanted to kill us. But we do not have the right to enrich ourselves with even one fur, with one Mark, with one cigarette, with one watch, with anything. That we do not have. Because at the end of this, we don't want, because we exterminated the bacillus, to become sick and die from the same bacillus.

I will never see it happen, that even one bit of putrefaction comes in contact with us, or takes root in us. On the contrary, where it might try to take root, we will burn it out together. But altogether we can say: We have carried out this most difficult task for the love of our people. And we have taken on no defect within us, in our soul, or in our character."

Especially the last paragraph of that speech, you can see that the German Nazis, all the way up to the Fuhrer himself, felt justified in their actions, that they were carrying out the will of God and the people, that everything they were doing was just and right, and that they had taken the terrible deed of eradicating the world's greatest enemy (the Jew) upon themselves, for the betterment of the Germans and mankind.

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Why I Use Facebook for Spreading Libertarianism

The majority of my Facebook friends have several mutual friends who are Ron Pal supporters (or are friends of friends who love Ron Paul/Libertarian content, due to the mutual-friends structure it can get a bit complex), meaning that there is an extremely high probability that the vast majority of my friends on Facebook are receptive to the kind of content I provide.

I have tested this theory for a while, and found that I have gotten a far higher per capita ratio of "likes" and "reshares" from Ron Paul/Libertarian content than I have from personal/non political content back before I was interested in Libertarianism. This is a trend I have continually tested since January of 2012. 

While a minority of friends may not appreciate the content as much, the vast majority are both highly appreciative and interactive, and this helps my content on Facebook ensures that Ron Paul and the liberty movement, and myself by proxy, to have maximal influence on Facebook. Furthermore, since Facebook still enjoys a far greater presence and political influence than Google+ does, it is the best site for the dissemination of my political ideas.

A third reason for using Facebook instead of Google+ as my political awareness platform, is because people on Google+ are far more technically-minded and have already formed their political opinions; additionally, most people are Google+ really don't want to share controversial political ideas, as they are considered to be academically distracting in comparison to the wide range of high quality art, knowledge, news, and opinions that could be shared instead. While it's quite possible to build a good libertarian network on Google+ (Alan LoveJoy does this extremely well, and I applaud him) it takes a lot of experience and knowledge of social marketing that I unfortunately I don't yet have.

As I've achieved critical mass of Ron Paul support on Facebook, it would not be in my best interest to curb my saturation of libertarian/Ron Paul "spam"; if anything, I should further optimize my feed for such posts. If you don't like the "spam", you can add me on Google+ instead, and I guarantee you a great amount of higher quality, predominantly non-Ron Paul content. I would highly recommend this if you didn't add me for Libertarian/Ron Paul content.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Why Mitt Romney Has Not Clinched the Nomination

What the lamestream media told you

Mitt Romney has clinched the Republican nomination for president with a win in the Texas primary.

The Associated Press delegate count shows that Romney surpassed the 1,144 delegates needed to win the nomination during Tuesday's primary. Early returns show Romney posting a big win in Texas.

What they neglected to tell you

The Associate Press's delegate count is at best an educated guess, and at worst pure speculation.

Here are the facts:

1. Mitt Romney has 591 legally bound delegates. The rest of the delegates are up for grabs, and it's anyone's guess who they belong to.

2. Ron Paul has been getting the majority of delegates in most states, and if crowd enthusiasm is a metric of delegates (which it has been thus far), Ron Paul is extremely likely to win the majority of unbound delegates in Texas.

3. Even if Mitt Romney miraculously got all of the bound delegates, he still would be far from clinching the nomination. The numbers just do not add up, it is mathematically impossible (not astronomical, impossible) For Romney to clinch the nomination at this point. There aren't enough total bound delegates available.

In summary, the AP and all the media outlets who listen to them are either complete idiots or liars. Mitt Romney has not clinched anything, in fact he is so far from clinching the nomination, that Ron Paul may very well have the majority of delegates.

Now, moving onto Texas:

*The delegate allocation system for Texas according to 2012 rules are as follows: 


Texas delegate breakdown:

155 total delegates
44 at-large delegates
108 congressional delegates
3 automatic delegates

At-large allocation: Up for grabs, completely unbound.

Congressional district allocation:
As Rule 38, Section 8 of the Republican Party of Texas rules describes, delegates are allocated to candidates in proportion to that candidate's share of the statewide vote.2 There is no threshold for receiving delegates. However, there is a threshold to receiving the assignment of particular delegates. If a candidate does not receive 20% of the vote statewide, then that candidate is not eligible for congressional district delegates unless he or she receives at least 20% of the vote in any given congressional district. All that really means is that a candidate under 20% statewide and 20% in all congressional districts will gain statewide, at-large delegates to "fill out" their allotment of delegates. Meanwhile, candidates, say Mitt Romney, well over 20% both statewide and on the congressional district will gather the assignment of the most delegates from the congressional district level as a means of completing the full allocation based on the overall statewide vote while the candidates further back will be assigned at-large delegates.

Election of these delegates will take place at the state convention on June 7-9.

Automatic delegate allocation:
The three Texas automatic delegates are free to pledge themselves to a candidate of their choosing. The national committee positions are elected to four years terms at one of the state conventions held every two even-numbered years. Those positions are term-limited after two consecutive terms. That means that committeeman and RNC legal counsel Bill Crocker -- serving since 2004 -- will be replaced in his role as committeeman at the state convention. Committeewoman Borah Van Dormolen was elected in a runoff in 2009 and is still in her first term. The party chairperson is elected every two years and can serve no more than four consecutive terms. Current chair, Steve Munisteri, was first elected to the post in 2010. He will be up for reelection at the state convention but will not be term limited.

(excerpted from http://frontloading.blogspot.com/2012/05/2012-republican-delegate-allocation_29.html)

For the real delegate count for the 2012 election, see this site: http://thereal2012delegatecount.com

Julian Assange vs. The World: Views on Justice and Morality

 When morality is decided only with those with the power to enforce justice, justice becomes a perversion, just as absolute power corrupts absolutely. To say that right and wrong can only by those with the power to do so, is to remove all intrinsic meaning from "justice" save for the exchange of power itself. Assuming the exchange of power to be the rightful appropriator of justice as the statements condemning Julian Assange's actions explicitly connote, morality is reduced to no more than the primitive imposing of the ruling party's interests by force, and with the case of the United States, military budget, technology, strength, and strategic authority.

Particularly since Julian Assange's leaks have targeted corruption dealing predominantly with the U.S. military-industrial complex, to write off his role as a mere "actor" and his actions as "wrong", is to demonstrate a disturbingly superficial conception of human ethics, as well as a pitifully naive understanding of the United States government, their actions in the Middle East, and impact of our military presence globally. These are issues that need to be addressed, and our own government failed to address them. 

Julian Assange is not a criminal or a saint, he is an inevitability, the natural response to a nagging need for transparency in governments and corporations worldwide. If he did not create Wikileaks, someone else would have, so I would further note that scapegoating him only demonstrates your ignorance of human nature, particularly regarding the reactive nature of humanity. The same type of vigilantism that created Wikileaks, that created Occupy Wall Street, that created Anonymous, that created the Ron Paul movement and the Tea Party, that created every single fictional and factual superhero that we have had throughout history. They are all projections of human nature, and part of the great jigsaw of humanity that we all are part of, down to the core of our very DNA.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

J.P. Morgan and the Fed

I think a lot of people don't realize that even before government bailouts, investment firms would bail out banks and corporations in order to protect their own investments. J.P. Morgan together with Rothschild loaned out huge amounts (3.5 million ounces) of gold (not money, gold!) in order to get us out of the panic of 1893, and Morgan joined with a coalition of bankers in order to get America out of the panic of 1907. Morgan's actions in the 1893 and 1907 panics directly resulted in the creation of the Federal Reserve, as summarized in the following (cited) excerpt from Wikipedia:

"Vowing to never let it happen again, and realizing that in a future crisis there was not likely to be another Morgan, banking and political leaders, led by Senator Nelson Aldrich devised a plan that became the Federal Reserve System in 1913.[15] The crisis underscored the need for a powerful mechanism, and Morgan supported the move to create the Federal Reserve System."

See that last part? Morgan *supported* the Federal Reserve System? Do you know why? The logic is obvious: Because the central bank is controlled by the Federal Reserve System, there is no more need for greedy investors like Morgan to protect their investments, and thus they can reap all the benefits of risky investments, but without all the risks! The problem with the Federal Reserve is that it takes all the risk out of the bank and investment firm system, allowing greed to run rampant, bad investment do go wrong, and if worse comes to worse, the benevolent Fed will bail all the big boys out at the 99%'s expense!

 
It's the biggest Ponzi scheme in the world, where the people at the top benefit most, and the common people who lack the pockets and connections for investments, get their faces shoved in the dirt and silenced with petty welfare benefits. What I don't get most, is that Occupy Wallstreet folk are expecting the government to save them from greedy banks and the corporations. Help us? The Fed is the one that reinforced greedy investments, created corporate monopolies, and encouraged economic inequalities in the first place! J.P. Morgan wanted the Fed to be created, and we can be sure that he did everything in his power to ensure his role in creating the Federal Reserve System protected all of his risky investments long after his death. J.P. Morgan, an incurably greedy scumbag to the very end!

Monday, April 16, 2012

Libertarians versus Progressives- Implementation: the Real Conflict of Interests

Ron Paul supporters: The biggest threat to our liberty, is actually people just like us: passionate, knowledgeable, morally-conscientious, intelligent, and nonconformist. When the progressive movement (our greatest philosophical threat!) started in the late 1800s, it was was not started by large corporations, psychopaths, corrupt pharmaceutical companies, greedy bankers, or communists (although communist philosophy did play the biggest role overall, so yeah I guess it was started by communists).....It was started by people who wanted to make the country a better place to live in, and also people that wanted to liberate Americans and make life more free.

Yes their ideas about freedom and quality of life were (and are!) radical and arguably delusional, but so are ours. Social Progressives make the same arguments against us that we do against them, that libertarianism enslaves the people, empowers corporations, creates socio-economic corruption, promotes an idealistic, utopic, and ultimately unworkable system, that we are ignorant, naive, asinine, and are unwittingly attacking the very freedom we stand for.

We share most of the same core values with Social Progressives, and libertarians and progressives attack each other for upholding the same exact values, and yet we are at odds, because we are in disagreement over implementation. This is a very sad state of affairs, because we all want the same exact things, and yet we are unable and unwilling to compromise because of an ages-long disagreement that, you might be surprised to know, date backs to before this country was even born! (Research the strained relationship between Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, John Adams, and early social progressive Alexander Hamilton for more details on this, I'll write a post dedicated to this later on). We all want the same things, but because we disagree on implementation, we are natural political enemies to each other, each others' every action, belief, idea, and piece of rhetoric a direct attack on the others' crusade for a better America and brighter future!

What can be done to resolve this paradoxical and horribly divisive political conflict of interests? I honestly don't know, but the first step to understanding each other is to know why we don't understand each other. So understand this, loud and clear: We aren't much different from liberals, we are in fact almost exactly the same in every way! We have the same personalities, same intelligence, same self-awareness, same thirst for knowledge, same desire to make both our country and the world a better place, same basic attitudes about life, same individualism, same conviction, same love of liberty even. We have all of this in common, and the only reason we don't get along-- the only real reason at all has both nothing to do with any of those things, and everything: Implementation! This is the only thing we have that's really different from liberals and social progressives, and that is the cause of the conflict of interest that America has faced since before the country began, and that we face even more than ever before today!

A Truly Free Healthcare Plan!

Update: A friend of mine brought it to my attention that my healthcare plan had the reasons why it works, but didn't mention what the healthcare plan was!  

The implementation is actually implied in the article, but it's so remarkably simple and obvious you probably didn't even see it. It's the healthcare plan almost everyone had before healthcare, and has been around since prehistoric times:

Take care of yourself! If you need to know how, there are plenty of books on plant biology, self-help, natural hygiene, and holistic medicine that work just fine, and all of which you can find growing wild. Everything we need for a healthy life has already been provided to us by nature!


I have an amazing healthcare plan, and unlike the so-called "free healthcare" that various countries around the world provide and American politicians are trying to enforce as law here, my healthcare plan truly is free.

Here are 10 reasons why my healthcare is far superior to Universal Healthcare:

1. My healthcare plan is completely personalized.
2. An unbeatable rate of $0 per lifetime, & requires no taxes or fees.
3. It's all-natural, and completely healthy.
4. It's additive and adulterant-free.
5. Doesn't fund corrupt pharmaceutical companies.
6. Doesn't rely on inefficient production and distribution systems.
7. Zero abuse and experimentation on humans or animals.
8. My healthcare plan has guaranteed coverage not dependent on a law, agency, system, company, or anything else for that matter.
9. My healthcare system encourages active awareness and knowledge of one's health rather than blind acceptance.
10. Ensures you have complete control over your healthcare.